Human Rights in Ireland


Launch of new Counter Extremism resource

Ross Frenett

The Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) has developed and launched www.counterextremism.org, an online resource for policy makers working on radicalisation and polarisation. It includes an easily searchable up-to-date repository of government policies and programmes, both current and historical, and contains a log of case studies and evaluated best practices. This library of resources acts as a one-stop-shop for those working to tackle radicalisation and polarisation, contains a diary of forthcoming events and meetings, and has an ‘expert finder’. The website also has the capability to support online practitioner network forums, ‘hot topic’ and crisis response chat rooms, and expert facilitated discussions. Funded by the European Commission, it is intended to help policy makers, decision makers, practitioners and academics to exchange information and examples of good practice, stay in touch, and remain up-to-date with latest developments.

Clinton on LGBT Human Rights

Ross Frenett

US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton today delivered a speech in Geneva to mark Human Rights day. This speech focused on LGBT human rights and is quoted in full below. It is certainly worth taking the time to read or watch, the video can be watched here.

 

Good evening, and let me express my deep honor and pleasure at being here. I want to thank Director General Tokayev and Ms. Wyden along with other ministers, ambassadors, excellencies, and UN partners. This weekend, we will celebrate Human Rights Day, the anniversary of one of the great accomplishments of the last century.

Read Full Post »

Owers report:Reforming the Northern Ireland Prison Service

Ross Frenett

In my first post for this blog last year I referred to the Northern Ireland Prison Service (NIPS) as the ‘blind spot’ of the Good Friday Agreement and highlighted the necessity for swift reform, not least due to propaganda value offered to anti-GFA groups through the appalling conditions prevalent at HMP Maghaberry. In addition to its treatment of those in Maghaberry, the NIPS has come under fire for its failure to adequately provide for prisoners with mental health issues, see Viki’s post in May. This week the Prison Review Team issued its final report (Owers report) making 40 recommendations to Justice Minister David Ford relating to reform of the NIPS. This commission, which was established as part of the Hillsborough Agreement in 2010, was originally tasked with:

Read Full Post »

Marian Price: Internment without trial?

Ross Frenett

The head of the Irish Republican Prisoners Welfare Association and leading member of the 32 County Sovereignty Movement Marian Price is currently being held in the hospital wing of Maghaberry High Security Prison, an otherwise male facility. Price, who was convicted of the Old Bailey bombings in 1973, has had her life licence revoked by Owen Patterson, the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland.

As a committed anti-GFA Republican, Price is no stranger to the criminal justice system. In the past number of years she has been charged with attending an illegal march, providing property (a mobile phone) for the purposes of terrorism and encouraging support for an illegal organisation. As of yet, Price has not been convicted of the latter two offences. The statement by Owen Paterson reads: Read Full Post »

Call for Unified Charter of Rights

Ross Frenett

The Joint Committee of the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission and the Irish Human Rights Commission have today called for the establishment of an all Island charter of rights.

The joint committee was established by the Good Friday Agreement which, which specifically mentioned the possibility of such a charter:

It is envisaged that there would be a joint committee of representatives of the two Human Rights Commissions, North and South, as a forum for consideration of human rights issues in the island of Ireland. The joint committee will consider, among other matters, the possibility of establishing a charter, open to signature by all democratic political parties, reflecting and endorsing agreed measures for the protection of the fundamental rights of everyone living in the island of Ireland. Read Full Post »

The ongoing crisis within Loyalism: A serious threat to peace

Ross Frenett

Last week I wrote a post dealing with the apparent demise of the political voice of Loyalism, the Progressive Unionist Party (PUP). In the week that has followed the other side of the Loyalist coin, the Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF), has orchestrated sectarian riots in Belfast by attacking Catholic homes in Short Strand. The ongoing violence has lead to three shootings, including that of a journalist. On the surface this rioting represents a repugnant but containable throwback to the ‘bad old days’ of sectarian strife. However to examine Loyalism in isolation would be a mistake, throughout the ‘Troubles’ the tit-for-tat interplay between Republicans and Loyalists defined the conflict.

An attempt has been made by political Loyalists such as those in the PUP to imbue Loyalism with a more positive identity. Documents such as Principles of Loyalism attempted to distil Loyalist thought and forge it into an identity which could apply in times of peace as well as of conflict. However this rebranding exercise, and political Loyalism with it, has largely failed. The Ulster Democratic Party(UDP), the political wing of the Read Full Post »

The demise of the PUP: A step backwards?

Ross Frenett

In the recent Stormont Assembly elections the Progressive Unionist Party (PUP) suffered a disappointing election result, failing to take a single seat.  This has led many, including senior party members, to ask whether or not the PUP, the political wing of the UVF, has a future as a serious political organisation. If what we are now witnessing is indeed the demise of the PUP, this is a disappointing development in the politics of the North, and potentially, for the peace process. As the only self identifying socialist party on the Unionist side of the fence, the PUP brought a unique perspective to the political spectrum of the North.

The PUP’s woes did not begin with the 2011 election; the organisation was thrown into crisis in 2010 when their then leader, Dawn Purvis, resigned her membership of the organisation in protest of continued UVF violence. With Purvis, the PUP lost their only elected MLA and the person who many felt could lead the party out from under the shadow of the UVF. However, in hindsight it is unsurprising that Purvis was unable to get to grips with the paradox at the heart of the PUP; an organisation linked to sectarian gunmen on the one hand, and liberal cross community values on the other. This is a difficult game to play and requires leaders who can command the respect of both sides of the coin, paramilitary and political. The untimely death of the highly respected David Ervine deprived the PUP, and Loyalisim, of the only figure who had a realistic chance of commanding the respect of both halves.  

Once Purvis resigned the PUP seemed to regress somewhat socially. The 2011 manifesto was in many ways, a step backwards compared to the 2007 manifesto, making no reference to Human Rights, sexual equality or racism. The PUP ran no female candidates in the last election, and their leader, Brian Ervine, strongly disagreed with his own party’s pro-choice position.

However the PUP remained a largely progressive party, focused on dealing with serious issues  facing the Protestant working class such as poor housing, educational underachievement (see Dawn Purvis’ recent report), benefit cuts, working class participation in the PSNI and a range of other issues. In addition to this the PUP were serious about improving inter-communal relations, proposing financial incentives for parents to enrol their children into integrated schools and increased cultural interchange. The PUP was the only Unionist party to have a representative  at the recent Belfast St Patricks Day parade

It has been argued that the above is all smoke and mirrors, and the real issue on which people should be judging the PUP is their continued association with the UVF. However, Republicans have demonstrated that it is possible to slowly move towards a more political path, while maintaining a paramilitary link.  Indeed that link can facilitate the disarmament and normalisation of said groups. Whether there is now anything left of the PUP worth saving is another question, but there is no doubt that at one time the PUP looked like it had the potential to have a positive impact on the lives of people in the North. The demise of that potential, if not the organisation itself, is to be regretted.  

What now for Al-Qaeda?

Ross Frenett

In the early hours of this morning President Barrack Obama announced that almost ten years after the September 11th attacks, Osama bin Laden had been killed by US Special Forces.  The unilateral nature of this operation and Bin Laden’s presence in Pakistan raises concerns relating to international co-operation (see Colin Murray’s post.) In order to understand the likely implications of Bin Laden’s death on Al-Qaeda, we must first understand the structure of the organisation and Bin Laden’s role within it.

Although Al-Qaeda was founded as a hierarchical organisation, arranging logistics and training for the Mujahideen resistance to the Soviets in Afghanistan, it has long since ceased to function in this fashion. Al-Qaeda has transformed into a network of affiliated groups, with little or no central command. While testifying before the House Armed Services Committee in December of 2009, Jarret Brachman stated that: Read Full Post »

Why the ‘dissidents’ kill

Ross Frenett

The murder yesterday of Ronan Kerr, a Catholic PSNI officer, by violent Republicans has brought condemnation from across the political spectrum and left many asking who could believe that the seemingly arbitrary killing of unarmed police officers could advance the cause of Irish unity. The blame for this violence has often been pinned on a ‘blood lust’ and those responsible have been accused of having ‘no strategy’. Although it is true that these groups maintain that violent resistance is a duty (post to follow in the coming days on the ideology of violent Republicans), this violence is not arbitrarily applied.

Read Full Post »

We are part of the Guardian Legal Network